mcdonald_has_a_farm_247 wrote:WELL ITS PRETTY BAD A NEW PERSON COMES ON AND ASK FOR HELP , AND HONESTLY MISS SPELLS A WORD AND GETS ATTACK FROM SO CALLED HOLLY ROLLERS THAT DONT DO NO WRONG ! AND GETS LOOK DOWN ON BECAUSE SHE STANDS UP FOR HER SELF AND NOT TAKE IT FROM ANYONE IT REAL LIFE . AND NOT ABOUT TO TAKE IT ON HERE EITHER !
No one attacked you. I said "
what?" because I couldn't make out what you were saying. This is not an attack. ParrontPlus suggested that responding with "PULL YOUR THUMB OUT OF YOUR BUTT", "PECKER HEAD", and other such phrases might not be a constructive debate technique. This is also not an attack.
No one has called anyone a "HOLLY ROLLER", so I'm not sure who the "SO CALLED HOLLY ROLLERS" are, let alone by whom they are supposed to be so called. For myself, I think "holiness" is a silly concept; at any rate I don't make any claim to infallibility. I have an unfortunate tendency to offend people by accident, and some people inform me that my writing style sometimes comes off as condescending. This is unfortunate, but not so unfortunate that I care to resort to writing in monosyllables to avoid it.
You do not need expletives or insults to stand up for yourself, nor
shouting in ALL CAPS -- I'm sure that in real life, you stand up for yourself all the time
without screaming obscenities. You might, for instance, have stood up for yourself by telling me that
"I don't care for your sarcasm. You know what I meant. I just didn't know how to spell 'wean'." (To which I might have replied,
"I'm sorry if I offended -- I honestly didn't know what you meant -- you wrote 'WING' so I thought it might have to do with wings -- fledging? -- and perhaps the tone came off poorly as I wrote it rather hastily. I was hoping you would clarify in response to my post, and help other people respond.") This, of course, is not what happened. I think it might have been preferable.